taxes and the wealthy

This topic has 36 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated March 6, 2008 at 3:15 pm by .

Viewing 0 reply threads

Author
Posts
- March 6, 2008 at 3:15 pm #256357
  Guest
  I just have to point out that Liss was not promoting a flat tax. She was talking about a sales tax on
  luxury items. That would clearly benefit the poor while forcing the rich to pay (by removing loop holes).
  And even if the difference in my taxes is not that great with a smaller IRS, it's still a savings!
  Why continue paying for a huge organization that is not needed??
  Jenny D
  On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Lori <lorimakesquilts@yahoo.com> wrote:
  And a flat tax is likely to be a huge burden to the poorest who already pay the least in overall taxes, while only make a small difference to the richest. Most folks are likely not to see a change at all. The difference in overall tax rates is not that huge. Even with a substantially reduced IRS.
  The difference in overall tax rates is not that huge.
  Lori.
  Viewing 0 reply threads
  You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
  Log In
  Username:
  Password:
  Keep me signed in
  
  Register
  › Budget101 Discussion List Archives › Budget101 Discussion List › taxes and the wealthy