- This topic has 36 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated March 6, 2008 at 3:15 pm by .
- Posts
I just have to point out that Liss was not promoting a flat tax. She was talking about a sales tax on
luxury items. That would clearly benefit the poor while forcing the rich to pay (by removing loop holes).
And even if the difference in my taxes is not that great with a smaller IRS, it's still a savings!
Why continue paying for a huge organization that is not needed??
Jenny DOn Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Lori <lorimakesquilts@yahoo.com> wrote:
And a flat tax is likely to be a huge burden to the poorest who already pay the least in overall taxes, while only make a small difference to the richest. Most folks are likely not to see a change at all. The difference in overall tax rates is not that huge. Even with a substantially reduced IRS.
The difference in overall tax rates is not that huge.
Lori.
recent activity
- [*]
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
88
New Members
[/list]Visit Your GroupYahoo! Groups
Special K Challenge
Join others whoare losing pounds.
How-To Zone
Discuss home and
garden projects.
Yahoo! Groups
Join the All-Bran
Day 10 Club.
.
PostsViewing 0 reply threads
